269 thoughts on “グレンデール慰安婦少女像反対！引き続き抗議の声を送ろう”

1. すずめ says:

   comment_ID: 2430 July 14, 2013 at 9:37 pm

   ---

   すんなり決まるかとおもいきや、
   多くの日本人のメールでの抗議に
   アメリカ在住の議員もたじろいだみたいですね。
   ニュースになっていました。
   私ももう一度、抗議してみようと思います。
   本当は、安倍総理か官房長官が、従軍慰安婦は無かったといえばすむことなんですよ。
   結局、河野談話で認めてるじゃないか、といわれてしまうのがおちです。
   それは、西尾幹二氏や、多くの言論人が
   「自分たちがいくら言ってもだめだ。政治家が言わなければ」といっています。
   それまでは、草の根の私達の運動で
   対抗するしかないですよね。
   あと、アメリカの議員は、民主党議員は中韓よりなのでもう入り込む余地はないけど、共和党議員ならまだ日本人のいうことを聞いてくれる余地があるという記事を読みました。

   Reply
   
   
2. 石坂 says:

   comment_ID: 2429 July 14, 2013 at 10:19 pm

   ---

   コピペだけではとても気がすまなかったので
   思いっきり日本語で長文書いて送信しました（笑）
   せめて１人でも日系の方の目に留まってくれればと。

   Reply
   
   
3. 高橋美紀 says:

   comment_ID: 2427 July 14, 2013 at 10:35 pm

   ---

   私もグレンデールへメール送りました。
   真実が届きますように

   Reply
   
   
4. 憂国 says:

   comment_ID: 2428 July 14, 2013 at 10:55 pm

   ---

   日韓基本条約の内容の英語版です。
   最近、韓国司法が新日鉄住金に日韓基本条約を無視して賠償を認めました。
   海外のメディアに、この条約破り行為を内容を知らしめて広めると韓国の感情的な民族異常性が周知出来ると思います。

   ソース
   (日本と朝鮮半島関係資料集
   東京大学東洋文化研究所
   田中明彦研究室
   http://www.ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~worldjpn/documents/indices/JPKR/
   英語版URL
   http://www.ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~worldjpn/documents/texts/JPKR/19650622.T9E.html )

   基本条約の英語版内容
   ※Agreement on the Settlement of
   Problems Concerning Property and Claims
   and on Economic Co-operation between
   Japan and the Republic of Korea.
   [Place] Tokyo
   [Date] June 22, 1965
   [Source] United Nations Treaty Collection
   [Notes] Quote from the United Nations
   Treaty Collection: “Translation by the
   Government of Japan. The Secretariat also
   received an English translation of this
   agreement from the Government of
   Republic of Korea which on certain points
   differs from that provided by the
   Government of Japan. At the request of
   the Government of Republic of Korea,
   these differences have been shown by
   printing in italics the pertinent word of
   phrase in the translation of the
   Government of Japan and providing in
   square brackets the corresponding
   expression in the translation by the
   Government of the Republic of Korea.”
   [Full text]
   Japan and the Republic of Korea,
   Desiring to settle [the] problem
   concerning property of the two countries
   and their nationals and claims between
   the two countries and their nationals; and
   Desiring to promote the economic co-
   operation between the two countries;
   Have agreed as follows:
   Article I
   1. To the Republic of Korea Japan shall:
   (a) Supply the products of Japan and the
   services of the Japanese people, the total
   value of which will be so much in yen as
   shall be equivalent to three hundred
   million United States dollars
   ($300,000,000) at present computed at one
   hundred and eight billion yen
   (¥108,000,000,000), in grants [on a non-
   repayable basis] within the period of ten
   years from the date of the entry into force
   of the present Agreement. The supply of
   such products and services in each year
   shall be limited to [shall be such] such
   amount in yen as shall be equivalent to
   thirty million United States dollars
   ($30,000,000) at present computed at ten
   billion eight hundred million yen
   (¥10,800,000,000); in case the supply of
   any one year falls short of the said
   amount, the remainder shall be added to
   the amounts of the supplies for the next
   and subsequent years. However, the
   ceiling on [Does not appear in the English
   translation provided by the Government
   of the Republic of Korea] the amount of
   the supply for any one year can be raised
   [increased] by agreement between the
   Governments of the Contracting Parties.
   (b) Extend long-term and low-interest
   loans up to such amount in yen as shall
   be equivalent to two hundred million
   United States dollars ($200,000,000) at
   present computed at seventy-two billion
   yen (¥72,000,000,000), which the
   Government of the Republic of Korea may
   request and which shall be used for the
   procurement by the Republic of Korea of
   the products of Japan and the services of
   the Japanese people necessary in
   implementing the projects to be
   determined in accordance with
   arrangements to be concluded under the
   provisions of paragraph 3 of the present
   Article, within the period of ten years
   from the date of the entry into force of
   the present Agreement. Such loans shall
   be extended by the Overseas Economic
   Cooperation Fund of Japan, and the
   Government of Japan shall take necessary
   measures in order that the said Fund will
   be able to secure the necessary funds for
   implementing the loans evenly each year.
   The above-mentioned supply and loans
   should be such that will be conducive to
   the economic development of the Republic
   of Korea.
   2. The Governments of the Contracting
   Parties shall establish, as an organ of
   consultation between the two
   Governments with powers to recommend
   on matters concerning the
   implementation of the provisions of the
   present Article, a Joint Committee
   composed of representatives of the two
   Governments.
   3. The Governments of the Contracting
   Parties shall conclude necessary
   arrangements for the implementation of
   the provisions of the present Article.
   Article II
   1. The Contracting Parties confirm that
   [the] problem concerning property, rights
   and interests of the two Contracting
   Parties and their nationals (including
   juridical persons) and concerning claims
   between the Contracting Parties and their
   nationals, including those provided for in
   Article IV, paragraph (a) of the Treaty of
   Peace with Japan signed at the city of San
   Francisco on September 8, 1951, is settled
   completely and finally.
   2. The provisions of the present Article
   shall not affect the following (excluding
   those subject to the special measures
   which the respective Contracting Parties
   have taken by the date of the signing of
   the present Agreement):
   (a) Property, rights and interests of those
   nationals of either Contracting Party who
   have ever resided in the other country in
   the period between August 15, 1947 and
   the date of the signing of the present
   Agreement;
   (b) Property, rights and interests of either
   Contracting Party and its nationals, which
   have been acquired or have come within
   the jurisdiction of the other Contracting
   Party in the course of normal contacts on
   or after August 15, 1945.
   3. Subject to the provisions of paragraph
   2, no contention shall be made with
   respect to the measures on property,
   rights and interests of either Contracting
   Party and its nationals which are within
   the jurisdiction of the other Contracting
   Party on the date of the signing of the
   present Agreement, or with respect to any
   claims of either Contracting Party and its
   nationals against the other Contracting
   Party and its nationals arising from the
   causes which occurred on or before the
   said date.
   Article III
   1. Any dispute between the Contracting
   Parties concerning the interpretation and
   implementation of the present Agreement
   shall be settled, first of all, through
   diplomatic channels.
   2. Any dispute which fails to be settled
   under the provision of paragraph 1 shall
   be referred for decision to an arbitration
   board composed of three arbitrators, one
   to be appointed by the Government of
   each Contracting Party within a period of
   thirty days from the date of receipt by the
   Government of either Contracting Party
   from the Government of the other of a
   note requesting arbitration of the dispute,
   and the third arbitrator to be agreed upon
   by the two arbitrators so chosen within a
   further period of thirty days or the third
   arbitrator to be appointed by the
   government of a third country agreed
   upon within such further period by the
   two arbitrators, provided that the third
   arbitrator shall not be a national of either
   Contracting Party.
   3. If, within the periods respectively
   referred to, the Government of either
   Contracting Party fails to appoint an
   arbitrator, or the third arbitrator or a
   third country is not agreed upon, the
   arbitration board shall be composed of the
   two arbitrators to be designated by each
   of the governments of the two countries
   respectively chosen by the Governments
   of the Contracting Parties within a period
   of thirty days and the third arbitrator to
   be designated by the government of a
   third country to be determined upon
   consultation between the governments so
   chosen.
   4. The Governments of the Contracting
   Parties shall abide by any award made by
   the arbitration board under the provisions
   of the present Article.
   Article IV
   The present Agreement shall be ratified.
   The instruments of ratification shall be
   exchanged at Seoul as soon as possible.
   The present Agreement shall enter into
   force on the date of the exchange of the
   instruments of ratification.
   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned,
   being duly authorized thereto by their
   respective Governments, have signed the
   present Agreement.
   DONE in duplicate at Tokyo, in the
   Japanese and Korean languages, both
   being equally authentic, this twenty-
   second day of June of the year one
   thousand nine hundred and sixty-five.
   For Japan:
   Etsusaburo SHIINA
   Shinichi TAKASUGI
   For the Republic of Korea:
   TONG WON LEE
   DONG JO KIM

   Reply
   
   
5. naoaki sawai says:

   comment_ID: 2426 July 14, 2013 at 11:11 pm

   ---

   To：
   dweaver@ci.glendale.ca.us, fquintero@ci.glendale.ca.us, lfriedman@ci.glendale.ca.us, anajarian@ci.glendale.ca.us, sochoa@ci.glendale.ca.us, ZSinanyan@ci.glendale.ca.us, citycouncil@ci.glendale.ca.us,

   We know that American people cherish and esteem fairness, justice, and truth. We wish that this controversial issue may not cause damage to a very important friendly relation among the countries.
   Comfort women, if a sex slave, have been exported to the United States from South Korea now, prostitutes will also sacrifice slaves. I will be your country has also lent a hand to the system of sexual slavery in South Korea. How will be?
   To say bad things of other countries from the old days, it was good at it to cause bad relations with other countries, Koreans, is ethnic. The case, there are plenty. Please check exactly. It is a nation that was and still does not change.
   Sincerely,
   Ｎａｏａｋｉ　Ｓａｗａｉ
   Ｈａｃｈｉｏｕｊｉ　Ｃｉｔｙ　ＪＡＰＡＮ

   Reply
   
   
6. 石川直幹 says:

   comment_ID: 2425 July 14, 2013 at 11:24 pm

   ---

   4,菅原信也さんへ

   元慰安婦証言を精査をされた由。
   大変貴重なデータだと思いますが、ＨＰ等で公表されているようでしたら是非拝見したいと思っていますが。
   よろしくお願いいたします。

   Reply
   
   
7. 横浜太郎 says:

   comment_ID: 2424 July 14, 2013 at 11:36 pm

   ---

   松下様の意見に全く同感です。
   ただ何もしないよりはと思い、先ほどメールしました。韓国は何が事実かというより、女性をさげすむ行為と米国にみられるよう話をうまくまげています。
   これに対しては、米国兵の恥ずべき行為をもっとPRするべきと思います。

   Reply
   
   
8. 鈴木　香 says:

   comment_ID: 2422 July 15, 2013 at 12:03 am

   ---

   韓国人の嘘にもう黙っていられません。
   今こそ日本人として先人たちの汚名を晴らさなければなりません。
   自分で近代史について色々調べれば調べるほど、どれだけアメリカをはじめ戦勝国と中韓に嘘の歴史を押し付けられていたことに愕然と気づかされます。
   ここで日本国民がしっかり自虐史観を脱却し正しい歴史認識を取り戻していかなければなりません。そのまず第一歩が従軍慰安婦なのではないかと思います。
   日本国内ではマスコミは報道しませんが、海外での韓国人の反日活動に対してもっと関心を持たなければいけません。
   少しでもお役に立てるように私も拡散します。

   Reply
   
   
9. ツマヨウジ says:

   comment_ID: 2423 July 15, 2013 at 12:26 am

   ---

   はじめてコメントさせていただきます。
   先日、ヤフーのリアルタイムにグレンデールの造形物に対する抗議先について、加州の広報室（日本の自治体広報室みたいなもの？無知ですみません）に対し「今回の決議結果により、加州は反日思想の強い方々が多いとみなし、これから先米国進出していく日系企業の方々にこの事案について注意喚起を促し、より親日で日系企業にとって良い環境にある地域を推奨していく」といったたぐいの抗議が一番効果的なのに、というコメントを拝見いたしました。
   加州より「そんなことはありません！」とすぐに返信されてきた、とのことです。
   皆様、ご存じでしたら申し訳ございません。

   Reply
   
   
10. 佐藤元宏 says:

    comment_ID: 2420 July 15, 2013 at 5:18 am

    ---

    下記のビデオをご利用ください。
    “3 faithful Korean scholars denied the sex slaves”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLh–sK1ago

    Reply
    
    

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

CAPTCHA Code *